arXiv preprint ·
Does Validation Loss Predict Real-Robot Success? Evidence from Four Imitation-Learning Policies on a Low-Cost Arm
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Held-out validation loss is the standard offline signal for choosing checkpoints and comparing models, but its relation to closed-loop success on a real robot is rarely measured. We measure it for ACT, Diffusion Policy, SmolVLA and $π_{0.5}$ (action expert only), trained on nested subsets of 12 to 200 demonstrations of a pick-and-place task on an SO-101 arm. We score 82 checkpoints on 25 held-out demonstrations, with each policy's training loss and with the error of the actions it outputs, and compare the scores with 930 bench rollouts. We also score all 700 intermediate checkpoints of 70 training runs, and recover the ball positions of every training, held-out and bench episode from the front camera. Within each policy, hold-out action error correlates with bench success (Spearman $ρ$ from -0.23 to -0.88), but no more strongly than the number of training episodes alone, and not at all among seeds trained on the same data. Across policies the ranking is inverted ($ρ$ = +0.90 at 200 episodes): the policy with the lowest hold-out error succeeded in 3 of 110 rollouts. The most common failure, the arm never leaving its rest pose, ended 96% of rollouts for Diffusion Policy trained on untrimmed demonstrations and 47% for SmolVLA, and cannot occur in a hold-out set made of demonstrations. Among rollouts in which the arm moved, SmolVLA's hold-out action error predicts success well ($ρ$ = -0.81). For the diffusion and flow-matching policies, hold-out loss rises two- to five-fold during training while hold-out action error falls by up to 29%. Held-out metrics are a sound diagnostic of learning but no substitute for evaluation on the robot, and we recommend reporting initiation failure and success among started rollouts as separate bench outcomes.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
MotorSense: A Video-EMG Dataset of Motoric Representations for Action Understanding
A Straight Line Is Not a Camera Pose: Auditing Short-Clip Pose Benchmarks
Mechanistic Interpretability for End-to-End Self-Driving
Knowing Where to Look: Interactive Object Search via Spatial-Semantic Fusion
A Capability-Aware Backup-Recoverability Filter for Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Navigation
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.