arXiv preprint ·

Continual Reinforcement Learning Is an Integration Problem

Nis Meinert, Jakob Gawlikowski, Edward Grant, Max Cyprys, Nathan Schurr, Neil Boston, Alfredo Ibias, Milind Tambe and Janusz Marecki

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine Learning

Abstract

This paper presents an opinionated set of ten desiderata intended to inform the design and evaluation of reinforcement-learning agents that learn continually throughout a continuing lifetime. We use these desiderata to examine a representative selection of existing approaches. Progress on individual desiderata is valuable, but the longer-term aim should be to integrate all ten within a single agent. To our knowledge, no published evaluation has yet provided evidence for such an integration. Likewise, the representative benchmarks we review probe different parts of this target, but separate evaluations do not establish that the corresponding properties coexist within one agent throughout a continuing lifetime. As a secondary contribution, we therefore present a compact persistent-world scenario as a playable companion to the desiderata and outline a proposed benchmark that examines a broad range of associated behavioral capabilities together within one such lifetime.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics