arXiv preprint ·
On-device Detection of Wearer-induced NLOS on Chest-worn UWB Tags: Machine Learning, Link Indicators, or Both?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
Smarter UWB Ranging, Right on the Tag
The authors evaluate 21 machine-learning, link-indicator, and hybrid classifiers for detecting wearer-induced NLOS on chest-worn UWB tags. Using 1.5 million samples, they show that accuracy, ranging errors from misclassification, runtime, and energy use vary substantially with channel and PHY configuration, and release a recommender tool to help select a classifier under user-defined constraints.
What they found: Across 21 classifiers and 1.5 million samples, the study finds that all approaches achieve good WNLOS classification accuracy. Relative performance—including the ranging errors caused by misclassification—depends heavily on the channel and PHY configuration. Runtime and energy efficiency also vary dramatically, with some techniques using up to 39.6 times more energy for only marginal accuracy gains.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Ultra-wideband (UWB) enables high-accuracy distance estimation (ranging), but performance degrades in non-line-of-sight (NLOS) conditions. When UWB tags are worn, the human body inevitably causes a wearer-induced NLOS (WNLOS), yielding significant errors; still, despite its relevance, WNLOS remains understudied. Moreover, WNLOS detection typically must occur on-device at the tag, requiring classification accuracy to be balanced against tight runtime and energy constraints often hard to meet with machine learning (ML) -- the dominating NLOS classification approach. Meanwhile, UWB radio link indicators (LI) offer a faster and lightweight alternative that has rarely been explored. We study existing on-device ML and LI classifiers when applied to WNLOS, and propose novel hybrid ones exploiting their complementarity. We focus on chest-worn tags and analyze 21 classifiers on a dataset of 1.5 million samples across channels, PHY settings, environments, subjects, and orientations. Results show that while all of them achieve good classification accuracy, relative performance, including ranging errors due to misclassification, depends heavily on channel and PHY configuration. Runtime and energy efficiency also vary dramatically; some techniques offer marginal accuracy gains while consuming up to 39.6x more energy. Therefore, we also introduce a recommender tool to identify optimal classifiers under user-defined constraints, publicly released with our dataset.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
MUON-RT Reusing the Teacher's Trajectory for Momentum-Free Muon for LLM Self-Distillation
Ensemble Classification and Cancer-Specific Gene Signatures from Quality-Aware Hybrid Gene Selection in TCGA RNA-Seq data
Differential rank preservation manifold learning
Where Causal Discovery Breaks on Real Data: Measuring the Assumptions One Property at a Time
TalentRL: Strategy-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Hierarchical Skill Routing
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.