arXiv preprint ·

Prompt Less, Infer More: Static Analysis-Guided LLM Type Annotation for Python

Wonseok Oh, Michael Pradel and Hakjoo Oh

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Software Engineering

Abstract

Type annotations improve the maintainability and reliability of Python programs, but many real-world projects remain under-annotated because manual annotation is time-consuming and error-prone. Recent neural and LLM-based type inference systems can recover missing annotations, yet they often trade accuracy for efficiency. Existing approaches often fail to exploit project-wide type evidence, or do so inefficiently through unnecessary model calls and noisy prompts. We present SALT, an LLM-based type inference system guided by static analysis. SALT integrates static analysis with LLM inference to resolve types statically, prioritize LLM queries, and construct concise type-aware context. To demonstrate the effectiveness of SALT, we evaluated it on 12 real-world Python projects. SALT achieves the best accuracy among the evaluated systems and reduces estimated LLM cost by up to 78.5% compared with a strong coding-assistant baseline. It also shows similar cost savings with the frontier model GPT-5.5, demonstrating that SALT remains effective with strong LLMs.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Software Engineering

Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics