arXiv preprint ·
Consensus Within, Competition Between: Decentralized LLM Teams for Perimeter Defense
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The use of large language models (LLMs) to coordinate multi-agent teams raises a fundamental architectural question: whether task allocation should be centralized in a single LLM controller or distributed across autonomous LLM agents, particularly when communication is unreliable. In a deliberately simplified perimeter-defense simulation against LLM-controlled intruders, we compared a central commander, an auction-based consensus team and independent agents under five network conditions. Breach rates were 15% for the consensus team, 32% for the commander and 29% for independent agents, and of the different network conditions, only limited radio range changed a team's breach rate, raising the commander's. In consensus team, giving a low-cost LLM more authority over the bid computation raised breaches by 38 percentage points. With birds and civilian drones in airspace, we added a photograph for each to the input text state. Only the near-frontier model treated them apart from intruders. Intruders disguised as existing taxidermy bird drones were mistook as birds by both low-cost and near-frontier LLMs, going unpursued in 59-61% of near-frontier decisions (1-16% before). However, a one-sentence forewarning in the prompt lowered it to 0-25%. We find that LLM team with a dedicated external conflict resolution protocol results in fewest breaches. Code: https://github.com/the-kas-lab/consensus-within-competition-between.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Tactus: Tactile & Pose Sensing Glove for Natural Dexterity Data Collection
MotorSense: A Video-EMG Dataset of Motoric Representations for Action Understanding
CAPTURER: A Dexterous Aerial Manipulator for Dynamic and Precise Grasping across Diverse Environments
Mechanistic Interpretability for End-to-End Self-Driving
Tracking Task Progress Through Errors and Recovery:A Benchmark and Recurrent Distributional Model
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.