arXiv preprint ·

Benchmarking One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Methods on Quantum Hardware

Melvina Quartey and Lucy T. Zhang

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Computational PhysicsFluid DynamicsQuantum Physics

Abstract

Classical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods encounter significant computational bottlenecks in large systems and at high Reynolds number flows due to the rapid increase in degrees of freedom, even on flagship supercomputers. As quantum computers emerge, the Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Method (QLBM) has been proposed as a quantum-native alternative for solving fluid dynamics problems. However, until recently, nearly all studies have relied on classical quantum simulators rather than real quantum hardware. This study presents a benchmark of a one-dimensional QLBM implementation executed on three different IBM Quantum hardware. We design and test a quantum circuit for the advection-diffusion equation using amplitude encoding, a Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK)-type collision operator, and a streaming step with periodic boundary conditions. Our numerical experiments evaluate transpiled two-qubit gate count, total circuit depth, runtime, and accuracy metrics including maximum absolute error ($L_\infty$ norm) and root-mean-square error (RMSE). We find that the present collision and streaming operators dominate the overall cost and become the primary scalability bottleneck on current hardware. To mitigate the prohibitive cost of full quantum state tomography on hardware-based benchmarking exercises, we introduce a sampler-based measurement strategy that reconstructs macroscopic density fields directly from computational-basis measurements. This approach substantially reduces measurement overhead while preserving the expected advection-diffusion dynamics on hardware. These results provide a quantitative assessment of QLBM performance in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) regime and identify the principal algorithmic and experimental limitations that must be addressed for QLBM to become viable for fluid dynamics.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Computational Physics

Get the few papers worth your time in Computational Physics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics