arXiv preprint ·

Unsupervised Feature Selection Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionality -- Extended Version

Oussama Chelly, Michael E. Houle, Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi, Muhammad Rajabinasab and Arthur Zimek

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine Learning

Abstract

High dimensionality degrades both the efficiency and the effectiveness of learning algorithms, and in many applications no class labels are available to guide dimensionality reduction. This paper proposes LIDFS, an unsupervised feature selection method based on Local Intrinsic Dimensionality (LID). The method builds on the formal equivalence between LID and the indiscriminability of distance measures. The data matrix is transposed so that each feature is treated as a point, and the LID of each feature is estimated by maximum likelihood from the distances to its $k$ nearest neighboring features. Features with lower LID exhibit greater local discriminability and receive higher importance scores. A refinement step then retains one representative per feature neighborhood and demotes locally redundant features. The result is a complete ranking from which any number of features can be selected without rerunning the procedure. LIDFS does not use any information about labels or the number of classes, and runs in $\mathcal{O}(d^2 n)$ time for $n$ instances and $d$ features. LIDFS is compared with classic and state-of-the-art methods and a random baseline on 23 high-dimensional datasets, the classic benchmark collection. The evaluation uses classification accuracy and AUC with five downstream classifiers, as well as clustering accuracy and normalized mutual information, over both full and aggressive selection ranges. LIDFS ranks first in the supervised evaluations and first or tied second in the clustering-based evaluations. It belongs to the top statistical group together with methods that require the number of classes, and it runs faster than its closest competitor. Several recent methods, by contrast, fail to outperform the random baseline. A sensitivity analysis shows that small neighborhood sizes yield the best results.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics