arXiv preprint ·
The Value of Experiments in Assortment Optimization
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Retailers can learn customer preferences by experimenting with different assortments. However, the cost of each experiment and the operational burden of repeatedly changing product offerings can make extensive experimentation impractical. We study how much a retailer can improve its final assortment decision using customer observations from one (or a very small number of) fixed experimental assortments. We consider the multinomial logit model, where product revenues are known but customer preferences are unknown. In this setting, we jointly design the experimental assortment and the rule for selecting a final assortment from observed customer choices to minimize worst-case regret: the expected revenue loss of the final assortment relative to an optimal assortment under the true preferences, maximized over possible customer preferences. We first characterize exactly the minimax regret and an optimal assortment when no experimentation is possible. We then show, surprisingly, that offering a single experimental assortment to just one customer can already substantially reduce regret, depending on how the products' revenues compare. We derive the exact minimax regret and an optimal experimental policy in this setting. When a single fixed experimental assortment is offered to many customers, we give a geometric characterization of the limiting minimax regret and construct an asymptotically optimal policy. Depending on product revenues, this single experiment can yield no improvement over no experimentation or nearly complete regret reduction. Finally, we extend our analysis to multiple experimental assortments chosen in advance, characterizing the limiting minimax regret, constructing asymptotically optimal policies, and identifying which collections of assortments allow worst-case regret to vanish as the number of customer observations grows.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Optimization & Control
LLM-Assisted Optimization for Simulation-Based Redesign
Local Budget Benefits, Population Commitment, and Solver Performance: A DGO Case Study with Controlled DE Transfer
There Is No Free Lunch in RLVR: Every pass@1 Gain Has a pass@k Price
Quantum Vehicle Routing Problem: a smart initialization strategy for ill-conditioned optimization landscapes
Information-Driven Collaborative Autonomy for Heterogeneous UAV/UGV Teams
Get the few papers worth your time in Optimization & Control every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.