arXiv preprint ·
SCARL: Sequence Confidence-Aligned Reinforcement Learning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves language-model reasoning by scoring sampled responses with a rule-based verifier and reinforcing those that pass. Where a classifier's training couples predicted probability to labels, nothing ties an RLVR policy's confidence in a response to its reward: aligned training would drive responses with the same advantage toward equal confidence, yet the advantage is blind to confidence. Under this sequence-confidence misalignment, a success the policy barely found earns the same update as one it produces with near certainty, and a confident error is corrected no harder than an exploratory one. We propose SCARL (Sequence Confidence-Aligned Reinforcement Learning), which reshapes, but never re-signs, each advantage with the alignment gap between the response's group-relative confidence and the outcome its advantage certifies, normalized into shares of each class's advantage budget. Misaligned samples absorb the force, responses with the same advantage are driven toward equal confidence, and repairing the misalignment doubles as a remedy for the entropy collapse that erodes exploration. SCARL provably reduces to its base estimator when a class's confidences agree, adds no extra passes and one hyperparameter. On Qwen3-4B-Base it lifts average Pass@32 by 2.4 points over DAPO and is best among nine compute-matched methods on both coverage and per-draw accuracy; applied unchanged across four estimators and four backbones, it improves 14 of 16 settings while preserving policy entropy and widening the confidence-correctness separation. Our code is available at https://github.com/kezhh163/scarl.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
When the Same Prompt Gives Different Answers (and the Same Answer Isn't Always Right): A Taxonomy of Failure Mechanisms, Testing, and Mitigation Strategies for LLM-Assisted Evidence Synthesis Read-and-Evaluate Tasks
CIRCE Divines LLM Task Complexity from Constraint Structure
Certified Access: Test-Time Compute on Conservative Physics-Structured AI Memory
Verifying Text-to-SQL Queries under Changing Business Semantics
HERA: Assessing an Autonomous Agent for Quantum Device Measurement
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.