arXiv preprint ·
Surprise Alone Learns Lies: Evidence-Gated Continual Learning for LLMs from Streaming Claims
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Continual learning methods for large language models increasingly decide what to learn by surprise, keeping the inputs the model finds least predictable. This rule is unsafe when the stream contains lies. A planted falsehood about something the model knows has low probability under the model's belief, so it is highly surprising by construction, and a surprise-driven learner absorbs nearly every such lie, at a rate similar to random selection with the same budget. We study the problem with LoRA-adapted students (Qwen2.5-1.5B, Qwen2.5-3B and Llama-3.2-3B) that learn from a stream of true and false claims about invented people and real CounterFact facts. We report four findings. (1) A verifier key, a judge that must approve each claim, removes lies to the extent that its verifier is accurate; real LLM judges are cautious and reject unsourced truths and even source-backed updates. (2) Calibrated regression tests on unrelated knowledge slow learning down without filtering out lies. (3) The original model's own prior flags claims that contradict what it knows, without a judge. It separates lies about known facts from true new facts (AUC 0.78-0.83 across three models) but not from legitimate updates of the same kind of fact (AUC 0.53). It saves 43% of judge calls, but an attacker with access to the model can choose lies that pass it. (4) If trusted sources exist that an attacker cannot plant, routing contradicted claims to evidence recovers legitimate updates and the combined system has the lowest poison rate among learned claims; when an attacker plants matching sources for 30% of the lies, the system ends up worse than the judge alone. The acceptance signals answer different questions, and none of them decides on its own whether a claim is true.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Usable String Matching by Humans through Overlaid Presentation
When AI Investigators Cannot Trust Their Tools: Conflict-Aware Evidence Verification for Cyber Threat Investigation
PCM: A Proof-Carrying Message Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Communication
ANGLER: Verifier-Grounded Benchmarking with an Adaptive Attacker for Web Agents
Appreciation Teaches Unauthorized Execution: Self-Evolution Degrades the Robustness of Personal Agents to Indirect Prompt Injection
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.