arXiv preprint ·
Activation Probes Are Reliable With a Handful of Positive Examples
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Efforts to monitor advanced AI for rare misalignments face a data challenge: abundant aligned examples but only a handful of misaligned ones. We test activation probes in this "few vs. thousands" regime on spam and honesty detection tasks. For our tasks, training with many negative examples is on average more positive-sample-efficient than balanced training for small numbers (1-10) of positive samples. We also find that LLM upsampling can provide a performance boost equivalent to roughly doubling the number of real positive samples, though excessive upsampling hurts performance. Finally, we show a positive scaling trend, where larger models are more positive-sample-efficient to probe. Our findings suggest we should leverage the large number of negative samples available to amplify the signal from rare but critical misalignment examples.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
PhysicsNeMo-Mesh: GPU-Native Meshes and Simulation Cases for Physics AI
MUON-RT Reusing the Teacher's Trajectory for Momentum-Free Muon for LLM Self-Distillation
Tactus: Tactile & Pose Sensing Glove for Natural Dexterity Data Collection
Differential rank preservation manifold learning
PALATE: Pretrained Autoregressive LATent Embeddings
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.