arXiv preprint ·
Sticky Collusion: Persistence of LLM Agent Collusion after Incentive Removal and Partner Replacement
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We ask whether collusion between AI agents survives once formed, when its incentive is removed or a colluder is replaced. Q-learning pricing agents stop colluding with a new rival; we test whether LLM agents do. We use the joint-task environment of Shi et al.\ (2026), where two agents verify each other's work under a rule they cannot satisfy and a reward that favours acceptance. We save each pair's history once its collusion has formed and resume it under interventions, with three models (GPT-6-Luna, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemini-3.1-Flash-Lite), \TotalHistories{} saved histories and \TotalRuns{} runs. Collusion is \emph{sticky}. First, it outlives its incentive: told that the reward has stopped, pairs still accept each other's unverified work in \GptToldRate, \DsToldRate{} and \GemToldRate{} of episodes, including pairs whose collusion began with an explicit agreement, and a payoff penalty has no significant effect. Second, replacing a colluder ends the pair's collusion but not the colluder's behaviour. Without the reward, the remaining colluder still accepts unverified work in \GptSwapSilentColluderRate, \DsSwapSilentColluderRate{} and \GemSwapSilentColluderRate{} of its verdicts while the newcomer never does; with the reward, collusion re-forms around it, even when the newcomer is a different model. Third, the agents' memory carries it: wiping memory ends it in every history, but partial memory often sustains it. Fourth, removing its cause ends collusion that has already formed: once the channel is repaired, colluders reject planted faulty work as reliably as fresh agents, immediately and with no monitor needed to catch it first.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Multiagent Systems
PCM: A Proof-Carrying Message Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Communication
When Disclosure Is Compulsory: Evaluating Ride-Hailing Rebalancing Policies with Self-Interested LLM Driver Agents
Soei: Structured Observability of Evidence and Intent for Multi-Agent AI Software Engineering
Understanding LLM-Based Bargaining of Driving Agents in Mixed-Autonomy Traffic
Bayesian Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Latent World Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Multiagent Systems every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.