arXiv preprint ·
Constant-Factor Approximation for Non-Splitting Coflow Scheduling in Heterogeneous Parallel Networks via Iterative Relaxation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Coflows capture the collective communication requirements of data-parallel applications, and scheduling them well is essential to the performance of modern data centers. We study non-splitting coflow scheduling in a heterogeneous parallel network whose $m$ network cores may be Electronic Packet Switches (EPS), not-all-stop Optical Circuit Switches (OCS), or all-stop OCS, where every flow must be transmitted entirely through a single core. Previous approximation algorithms for this setting have guarantees that grow linearly with the number of cores $m$ or with the maximum flow degree $τ$ of a port, and therefore become weak as data centers deploy more cores. The source of this dependence is the rounding step: rounding each flow to the core holding its largest fractional value can inflate the load of a port by a factor of $m$. We replace this step with an iterative relaxation rounding scheme that handles the input-port and output-port capacity constraints simultaneously. For minimizing the makespan, this yields approximation ratios of $\min\{τ, 3\}$, $2\min\{τ, 3\}$, and $4\min\{τ, 3\}$ for pure EPS, pure not-all-stop OCS, and pure all-stop OCS networks, respectively. For minimizing the total weighted coflow completion time, we obtain approximation ratios of $8\min\{τ, 4\}$, $16\min\{τ, 4\}$, and $32\min\{τ, 4\}$ for the same three architectures. In a hybrid network, the guarantee is governed by the weakest architecture present, so the overall ratios are at most $4\min\{τ,3\}\le 12$ and $32\min\{τ,4\}\le 128$, respectively. Unlike all previous guarantees for non-splitting coflow scheduling in heterogeneous parallel networks, these bounds are absolute constants that do not grow with the number of cores $m$ or with the flow degree $τ$. We also show that the integrality gap of the underlying linear program is at least $2$.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Data Structures & Algorithms
Get the few papers worth your time in Data Structures & Algorithms every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.