arXiv preprint ·
Diagnosing the Reference Gap: What Visual Scaffolds Can and Cannot Fix in Multimodal Reasoning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Multimodal large language models can recognize visual content yet struggle to reason reliably over it across multiple steps. In counting, a model may see all objects but lose track of which ones it has counted. We argue that such failures, commonly attributed to perception, reveal a reference gap: the failure to bind language to the relevant visual entities, regions, or locations. Motivated by the theory of visual routines, we test whether external references such as numbering can narrow this gap. We introduce ReGap-Bench, a paired benchmark of five visual reasoning tasks in which the scene, question, and answer are fixed and only the reference varies. Results show that task-matched references improve accuracy by up to 25\%, while mismatched references provide little benefit or even hurt performance. These findings identify the reference gap as a bottleneck distinct from visual perception and show that constructing task-appropriate visual references can serve as a training-free visual skill for improving multimodal reasoning.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
HALO: Human-Grounded Granular Evaluation of Proactive Agents
MUON-RT Reusing the Teacher's Trajectory for Momentum-Free Muon for LLM Self-Distillation
A Novel Approach to Evaluating Evaluation Metrics for Multi-Output Structured Prediction
Language Models Show a "Women-Are-Wonderful" Effect in Blame Attribution That is Not Just Leniency
Reading-Level Verification of Kanji Words in Japanese Financial Speech Synthesis
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.