arXiv preprint ·
Zero-Complement Extrapolation: Parameter Recovery and Classification in Severely Imbalanced Logistic Regression under Rank-Deficient Regimes
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Parameter estimation and classification in binary logistic regression deteriorate severely when the number of minority class observations ($n_1$) is smaller than the feature dimension ($p$). Under such rank-deficient rarity ($n_1 < p$), maximum likelihood estimators suffer from quasi-complete separation, penalized likelihood methods exhibit severe intercept bias, and convex minority oversampling techniques such as SMOTE collapse into an $(n_1 - 1)$-dimensional affine subspace. In this paper, we propose a novel \textit{Self-Calibrated Zero-Complement} estimator that shifts the paradigm from minority interpolation to majority fringe extrapolation. Grounded in Stein's Lemma, we prove that the conditional expectation shift of the abundant majority class ($Y=0$) induced by logistic truncation uniquely identifies the true hyperplane normal $\boldsymbolβ$ after Mahalanobis whitening. We further establish that extrapolating synthetic minority instances outward from the high-quantile density fringe of the majority distribution along the conjugate direction preserves full-rank covariance regularity ($\mathrm{rank} = p$). To accommodate both semi-supervised environments (with an unlabeled background mean) and strictly supervised subsamples, we introduce a hybrid estimator incorporating the intrinsic third-moment skewness of the majority class alongside a location-shift-invariant zero-boundary intercept calibration. Extensive Monte Carlo simulations and real-world benchmark applications (Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer and Banknote Authentication) under extreme rarity ($n_1 \in \{3, 5\}$) demonstrate that our approach prevents parameter divergence, recovers the oracle hyperplane with high fidelity, and substantially outperforms Firth's regression and SMOTE in F1-score and estimation stability.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning (Statistics)
When the Same Prompt Gives Different Answers (and the Same Answer Isn't Always Right): A Taxonomy of Failure Mechanisms, Testing, and Mitigation Strategies for LLM-Assisted Evidence Synthesis Read-and-Evaluate Tasks
Instrumental Transfer Learning for Solution Operators
Reliability-Weighted Direct Preference Optimization: Penalized Weights for Robust Preference Learning
Confidence Filtering in Video-Based Gait Assessment: Measurement Error versus Selection Shift
Outstrumental Variable Regression
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning (Statistics) every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.