arXiv preprint ·
BASILISC: Bayesian Alignment of Siamese-Integrated Latents for Inferring Single-cell Correspondence
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Single-cell assays study the genome one cell at a time. Unimodal assays measure one molecular layer, the newer multimodal assays measure several. Most data are single-modality, so integrating them relies on models trained on multimodal assays, where the cell correspondence across modalities is known. These models return a matching, but rarely a confidence measure. We present BASILISC (Bayesian Alignment of Siamese-Integrated Latents for Inferring Single-cell Correspondence), a framework for matching single-cell representations with uncertainty on the correspondence itself. A BASILISC model is a probabilistic siamese network over the two modalities with a predictive distribution over the correspondence for a cross-modal pair of cells. We instantiate it at two levels: at the cell-type level the question is whether two cells share a cell type, at the cell level which cell is the partner in the other modality. To our knowledge, this is the first uncertainty score on a learned cross-modal correspondence evaluated against a known ground-truth pairing. BASILISC learns a similarity across modalities that reflects cell lineage: an unseen cell type is matched to its lineage relative, matching still works on such held-out types (balanced accuracy 0.86 on unseen against 0.93 on seen types), and the predictive uncertainty rises on these out-of-distribution cells. The uncertainty score also selects high-quality matches for downstream analysis: discarding the least certain fifth of the pairs raises accuracy from 0.93 to 0.98. At the cell level, a deep ensemble of the deterministic matcher reaches 0.062 matching accuracy on the benchmark test set, above the competition winner; on the Bayesian matcher's assignment, the posterior flags the wrong matches that cross a cell-type boundary better than a deterministic read of the same scores (AUROC 0.68 against 0.64).
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Jailbreak Connectivity: Towards Diverse, Transferable, and Universal Multimodal Large Language Model Jailbreak
PhysicsNeMo-Mesh: GPU-Native Meshes and Simulation Cases for Physics AI
Nemotron 3.5 Super and Lightning: Open, Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Models for Agentic AI
Tactus: Tactile & Pose Sensing Glove for Natural Dexterity Data Collection
Evaluating Causal Reasoning in LLMs: A Case Study in the Challenges of Procedural Generation
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.