arXiv preprint ·

Representation Complexity Along Learning Trajectories: Trading Width for Precision and Time

Ryan Singh, Miguel De Llanza and Christopher L. Buckley

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine LearningArtificial Intelligence

Abstract

What computational role does overparameterisation play during learning? Information-plane analyses suggest that neural networks can traverse representations substantially more complex than those required by their final predictors. We explore when this transient complexity serves a computational purpose by comparing the representation complexity needed for prediction with that needed to make an unknown target statistically visible through gradient feedback. We introduce an oracle model of neural network learning and use Kolmogorov \(n\)-widths to quantify effective representation complexity. Our main technical result transfers complexity bounds from the forward representation to the corresponding gradient-query features. Combined with statistical-query lower bounds, this gives a task-agnostic lower bound on the initial effective width required for target-dependent gradient information to become detectable. For \(k\)-sparse parity in \(D\) dimensions, a known target admits an \(O(k)\)-width representation, while the general bound already implies a polynomial separation between representation and discovery. We then exploit parity's invariance under coordinatewise sign reflections to identify a sharper unsigned effective width, which removes sign distinctions invisible to the parity information channel. At a transfer-compatible measurement resolution, its critical scale is \(\widetildeΘ_k\left( D^{k-1}τ^2 \right)\), up to logarithmic factors. Thus, the representation resources required to discover a predictor can substantially exceed those required to represent it once learned. Interpreting precision through accumulation over fresh samples yields a corresponding width-time frontier. Experiments support the predicted dimension dependence and examine how optimisation and generalisation depart from this idealised frontier.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics