arXiv preprint ·
Assessing feature scorer results on high-dimensional datasets with t-SNE
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130561
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
While vast literature on high-dimensional data visualization is available, there are not many works regarding the visualization of feature scorers and their results. Feature scorers are algorithms that assign numerical importance to each feature of multi-dimensional datasets. These importance scores can be used in several applications, such as feature selection, knowledge discovery, and machine learning interpretability. There are several feature scorers to choose from, and often no single metric or ground truth is available to guarantee the quality of their results. In this scenario, visualization can become valuable to support the decision of which method to choose and how good its results are. For this goal, this work presents "weighted t-SNE." It modifies the relationship between data points in the embedded 2D space to reflect the importance of each dimension of the original datasets as assessed by a feature scorer. This research discusses how to implement weighted t-SNE, proposes the silhouette coefficient as a numerical evaluation of the results, and shows several examples of its use in practice. Synthetic and real-world tabular datasets are used in the experiments together with nine feature scorers, ranging from Mutual Information to neural networks. Each feature scorer produces unique visualizations, and weighted t-SNE can be used to compare and choose the one that better suits a given dataset and task. Weighted t-SNE can also visually show the importance of features learned by machine learning models and help us see how they are organizing the data, increasing their interpretability.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
What Can Firms Do in the Face of Model Distillation?
When the Same Prompt Gives Different Answers (and the Same Answer Isn't Always Right): A Taxonomy of Failure Mechanisms, Testing, and Mitigation Strategies for LLM-Assisted Evidence Synthesis Read-and-Evaluate Tasks
Predicting What Answer Engines Cite: Open Decision Models, Rerankers and a Distilled 4B Student on Ten Engines under Controlled Retrieval
Certified Access: Test-Time Compute on Conservative Physics-Structured AI Memory
Jailbreak Connectivity: Towards Diverse, Transferable, and Universal Multimodal Large Language Model Jailbreak
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.