arXiv preprint ·
The Utility of Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Solar Power Production Forecasting
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
When Solar Forecasts Don’t Need More Physics
This study tests two ways of blending a physical PV-efficiency model with a neural forecasting architecture. Across a large, geographically diverse dataset, the hybrids showed slightly faster training convergence but no consistent advantage in accuracy, regional generalization, or performance with limited data.
What they found: The study evaluated two ADR–TSMixer hybrids on data from 3,713 PV installations across 33 European countries. The physics-informed models appeared to converge slightly faster during training, but did not consistently improve test-set accuracy. They also showed no consistent advantage in transfer to other regions or when training data was limited.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) and hybrid modeling have attracted significant attention as approaches for combining physical knowledge with the flexibility of deep learning. In this work, we investigate whether these approaches deliver their commonly claimed benefits for large-scale photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting. We develop two hybrid forecasting architectures that integrate the ADR physical PV efficiency model with the TSMixer neural forecasting architecture through feature augmentation and residual learning. The proposed models are evaluated on a dataset comprising over 3 million samples from 3,713 PV installations across 33 European countries. We assess convergence speed, forecasting accuracy, transferability across geographical regions, and data efficiency. Although the physics-informed models seem to exhibit slightly faster convergence during training, they do not achieve consistent improvements in test-set accuracy, generalization, or performance under limited training data compared to the purely data-driven baseline. These findings suggest that, for modern deep forecasting architectures trained on large datasets, explicitly incorporating the ADR physical model provides limited practical benefit for day-ahead PV forecasting.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Jailbreak Connectivity: Towards Diverse, Transferable, and Universal Multimodal Large Language Model Jailbreak
PhysicsNeMo-Mesh: GPU-Native Meshes and Simulation Cases for Physics AI
Nemotron 3.5 Super and Lightning: Open, Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Models for Agentic AI
Tactus: Tactile & Pose Sensing Glove for Natural Dexterity Data Collection
Evaluating Causal Reasoning in LLMs: A Case Study in the Challenges of Procedural Generation
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.