arXiv preprint ·
Homodyne versus heterodyne detection for classifying families of optical quantum states from finite records of detection events
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Neural networks can identify an optical quantum state from an image of its phase-space function, but a real measurement gives a finite record of $N$ detection events. Heterodyne detection samples the Husimi $Q$ function directly, whereas homodyne detection gives the Wigner function only after a reconstruction from several phases. We ask which scheme better identifies one of seven families of states, including Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states, under loss, dephasing and Gaussian noise. We simulate finite records on identical states for two sets of families, one with equal mean photon number and one built from the code of Ahmed et al. For convolutional networks, heterodyne detection outperforms homodyne detection with filtered back-projection by 14.1 percentage points at $N=100$ events and 20% dephasing in the first set (adjusted $p=0.003$ over $24$ cells across training runs), and it depends on the number of phases and on the reconstruction. At $N=10^3$ and $10^4$ no difference is significant, but the intervals are wide. At $N=100$, a homodyne network without reconstruction does not differ significantly from heterodyne detection in the first set and is nominally worse in the second. Near thermal states we show to leading order that heterodyne detection damps phase-space structure of order $n$ exponentially, whereas homodyne detection shares unit weight among $n+1$ angular components, a local result that does not explain the finite-record differences. Experimental records of a GKP state, photon-subtracted squeezed states and one mode of an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen source are classified like simulated ones, but these low-power tests probe our counting-noise model, not the seven-class accuracy. A likelihood-ratio observer shows no such gap at $N=100$, so our evidence concerns a reconstruction-based pipeline, not homodyne detection in general.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Quantum Physics
A Coherent Neutron-Nucleus Hybrid System Mediated by the Strong Interaction
A rhombic spin-1 interpretation of a room-temperature GaN emitter
Experimental Observation of Error-Resilience Phase Transition on Superconducting Quantum Processor
Time-Switching Energy-Harvesting Quantum Relay-Assisted FSO Communication with Displaced Squeezed Signaling
Quantum advantage by designing beneficial dissipation from lossless dynamics
Get the few papers worth your time in Quantum Physics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.