arXiv preprint ·
Detecting Fine-Grained Differences between Image Datasets
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Detecting whether and in particular how two data distributions differ is a fundamental statistical problem. For example, we might be interested in which concepts (expressed in natural language) differ between two classes, the outputs of different generative models, or the same model with different prompt specifications. When working with large and complex image datasets, we intuitively think that first selecting concepts from a broad list using fine-grained patch embeddings, and then optimizing the concepts to better fit the data is an effective workflow. However, prior work instead uses MLLMs to propose concepts and image-level embeddings to select them. Therefore, we systematically compare these techniques and find that selecting concepts from broad lists can replace MLLM-proposals at obviously lower cost. MLLM inference can then be spent on optimizing selected concepts instead to achieve substantial improvements. Additionally, by designing a new benchmark that focuses on low-prevalence and multi-concept distinctions, we find that selecting nonredundant concepts instead of only the most distinguishing concepts matters, and we introduce techniques for how to effectively do this. Finally, we show how our methods address important problems like detecting spurious correlations and biases. Overall, our work presents a fundamental perspective shift on how we analyze interpretable distributional differences between datasets.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
From Next Day Wildfire to Next Days Wildfire: A New Multi-Continent Dataset of Active-Fire Spread for Sequence-to-Sequence Forecasting
Kinematic Causal Attribution: Black-Box Explanations of Motion versus Geometry for 4D Point-Cloud Video Models
The Prestige: Benchmarking Cognitive Visual Reasoning using Magic Tricks
STRATA: Reinforcement-driven Active Sampling with Tri-paradigm Adaptation for Efficient 3D Spatial Transcriptomics
Who Called? V33DA: A Physically Verified Multimodal Benchmark for Vocal Attribution in Zebra Finch Groups
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.