arXiv preprint ·
A Witnessing Duality for ReLU Network Depth
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A depth lower bound for ReLU networks asserts that every sufficiently shallow network fails on some input. What does a proof of such a bound compute? We study this question for exact computation of the maximum of $n$ real inputs, with depth measured by the number of hidden layers. For every separately fixed prime $q$ and depth bound $K$, we give a uniform $\mathsf{TC}^0$ refuter for rational networks with at most $K$ hidden layers and more than $q^K$ inputs, provided that the reduced denominators of their nonbias weights are not divisible by $q$. Biases may be arbitrary rationals. The refuter finds a rational input on which the network fails, and its correctness is provable in $\mathbf{VTC}^0$, the bounded-arithmetic theory of uniform constant-depth threshold computation. The underlying numerical depth lower bound follows from Averkov, Hojny and Merkert (ICLR 2025), extending Haase, Hertrich and Loho (ICLR 2023); our contribution is an internal proof that makes its geometric argument into a feasible refuter. On the construction side, $\mathbf{VTC}^0$ verifies locally checkable certificates for the balanced integer-weight maximum network of depth $\lceil\log_2 n\rceil$. At $q=2$, the construction and refuter meet: for each fixed $K$, the theory verifies that integer-nonbias-weight networks with arbitrary rational biases can compute the maximum with at most $K$ hidden layers exactly when $n\le 2^K$. We also give certified rational constructions of polynomial encoding length and depth $O(\log n/\log\log n)$. These results instantiate a witnessing duality: bounded proofs of certified existence and of refutation correspond, respectively, to threshold-computable constructors and refuters whose guarantees the theory proves.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computational Complexity
Scaling Lean Theorem Proving for Real-World Code Verification
Learning Erasing Equal-Length Relational Pattern Languages in the Limit from Positive Data over Binary Alphabets
Automated Verification of Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing
Order Maintenance in Worst-Case Constant Time, Verified
From the Transformer to a Formal Semantics of Coordinated Transformations
Get the few papers worth your time in Computational Complexity every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.