arXiv preprint ·
Neighbourhood shortcuts in building damage assessment from very-high-resolution satellite imagery: diagnosis and a building-evidence plug-in
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Building damage assessment (BDA) from very-high-resolution imagery supports disaster response, and deep models now achieve high overall accuracy on public benchmarks. Because damage is spatially clustered, most buildings share the damage level of their neighbours, so overall scores are dominated by such buildings, whereas damaged buildings among intact ones are rare and easily overlooked. A high overall score therefore cannot tell whether a model judges the building itself or relies on its neighbourhood as a shortcut, and this study tests which of the two current models do. We stratify buildings by their agreement with their neighbours, move buildings into new neighbourhoods with their pixels unchanged, and diagnose nine models covering the main paradigms of BDA. All models miss a third to half of the isolated damaged buildings, and in non-flood events they call 73--87% of intact buildings damaged once these are moved into a damaged neighbourhood. We propose a building-evidence plug-in that adds two experts to an existing model without retraining it. One expert sees only the building, and the other sees its surroundings but is trained with seamlessly swapped neighbourhoods so that it learns not to trust them. With each of the nine models, the plug-in maintains or improves overall accuracy, reduces errors on buildings that disagree with their neighbours by 8--18%, and cuts by 40--69% the intact buildings that a damaged neighbourhood turns into damaged ones. It also raises the detection of synthetic isolated damage from 1--6% to 13--39% and carries over to optical--SAR data and to an unseen earthquake. High overall scores thus conceal a systematic reliance on the neighbourhood, which building-level evidence reduces at low cost.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
From Next Day Wildfire to Next Days Wildfire: A New Multi-Continent Dataset of Active-Fire Spread for Sequence-to-Sequence Forecasting
Kinematic Causal Attribution: Black-Box Explanations of Motion versus Geometry for 4D Point-Cloud Video Models
The Prestige: Benchmarking Cognitive Visual Reasoning using Magic Tricks
STRATA: Reinforcement-driven Active Sampling with Tri-paradigm Adaptation for Efficient 3D Spatial Transcriptomics
Who Called? V33DA: A Physically Verified Multimodal Benchmark for Vocal Attribution in Zebra Finch Groups
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.