arXiv preprint ·
REEL: Same Frames, Different Answers and Different Costs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Video understanding keeps moving toward longer recordings, and the longer a recording is, the more questions can be asked about it. But processing it again for every question does not scale, so many systems watch the video once, build a memory, and answer later questions from it. Yet what to remember is decided before anyone knows what will be asked, and whatever is left out cannot be recovered later. Moreover, whether the savings pay off is judged by token counts, which fall when the input gets shorter but not when the model reuses what it has already computed. We present REEL, an evaluation framework that compares three saved representations built from exactly the same observed frames, so that a change in answers can come only from what the system remembered. Text writes a short record of what happened, Visual keeps the encoder outputs, and Prefix State also keeps the language-model prefix. Each is compared with full reprocessing (Frames) by paired correctness changes, cumulative GPU time, and storage size. Across six vision-language models and two benchmarks, Text and Frames differ in correctness on 20\% to 29\% of questions, even when their mean accuracy is almost the same. By contrast, Visual and Prefix State stay much closer to Frames. With unlimited storage, Prefix State is the cheapest in total GPU time among memories that keep almost all of the answers Frames gets right, for every model on both benchmarks. The trade-off is storage: Prefix State keeps up to about 21 GiB per video, whereas Text needs only kilobytes. Reusing computation and discarding information both look like efficiency, but only the second removes evidence that later questions may need, and neither mean accuracy nor token count tells them apart. REEL makes that difference measurable for any system that answers many questions from one saved memory.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
From Next Day Wildfire to Next Days Wildfire: A New Multi-Continent Dataset of Active-Fire Spread for Sequence-to-Sequence Forecasting
Kinematic Causal Attribution: Black-Box Explanations of Motion versus Geometry for 4D Point-Cloud Video Models
The Prestige: Benchmarking Cognitive Visual Reasoning using Magic Tricks
STRATA: Reinforcement-driven Active Sampling with Tri-paradigm Adaptation for Efficient 3D Spatial Transcriptomics
Who Called? V33DA: A Physically Verified Multimodal Benchmark for Vocal Attribution in Zebra Finch Groups
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.