arXiv preprint ·
What Language Models Add to Healthcare-Equity Rankings, and What They Could Have Known
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
In healthcare equities, much of what moves a single name arrives as text: filings, trial and regulatory records, news and analyst commentary. We evaluate how screened non-market features and language-model representations improve market-based equity rankings for US healthcare firms over 2020-2025. Adding balance-sheet and attention features improves the resulting hybrid's price- and liquidity-neutral rank information coefficient (IC) at one, three and twelve months. At twelve months, neutral IC rises from 0.063 to 0.093, a 48% increase, while raw IC rises from 0.289 to 0.298. Language models contribute most clearly at three months: among company-months with scientific-text coverage, a current embedding model raises the hybrid's neutral IC from 0.046 to 0.056. This increment is nominally significant (t = 2.8; paired 95% bootstrap interval [+0.006, +0.015]) and remains exploratory. A larger post hoc gain occurs in months containing trial or regulatory records, consistent with text complementing prices and financial statements at that horizon. Across all text, pre-2020 and current representations yield small positive three-month increments in both neutral and raw IC but no established twelve-month gain. Much of their ranking performance survives within-company time shuffling, consistent with a persistent company component. Rater-cutoff comparisons find negligible pre-cutoff advantages for current models over the pre-2020 rater at one and three months that do not shrink after the cutoffs; twelve-month hindsight attribution remains inconclusive. At twelve months, balance-sheet signals lead after rallies and in volatile markets, while attention leads after declines. Retrospective state-dependent blending improves on a static blend without an established advantage over the full hybrid. Results apply to a survivor-only sector sample and remain unadjusted for the full exploratory search.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computational Finance
An Application of Geometric Riemannian Pricing Algorithm for Valuing Catastrophe Bonds in Incomplete Markets: Market-Consistent Financial Entropy and the Split of Frequency and Severity Risk Premia
Neural Network Methods in the 2BSDE Formalism for Solving the High-Dimensional Black--Scholes Equation with Transaction Costs
Optimal Order Placement under a State-Dependent Hawkes Process Limit Order Book model
QBX: A Compiler for Well-Formed, Auditable Alpha Programs
A New GAUSS Software Component for Implementing Dynamic Tests of Contagion with an Application
Get the few papers worth your time in Computational Finance every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.