arXiv preprint ·
Are quantum measurements universal?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
With D. Aerts, we showed in 2014, within the extended Bloch representation of quantum mechanics, that the Born rule can be understood as resulting from a universal average over all the possible ways in which the measurement-interactions can be selected. The cellular construction used there was since questioned, in the context of Bertrand's paradox, by N. Shackel, who observed that the result depends on the discretization adopted, that the sequence of averages is constant, and that the sense in which the average is taken over "all" densities remains unclear. Taking these criticisms as a stimulus, we re-examine the notion. The key is to recognize that a universal measurement is a random way of selecting a measurement which does not privilege any portion of the structure describing the available interactions, a property we call indifference. We prove that every indifferent universal measurement, however constructed, produces exactly the Born probabilities: the universal average is unique, and the cellular construction of 2014 is one among infinitely many ways of obtaining it, exact at every finite resolution. Non-trivial indifferent universal measurements exist, but must involve deterministic measurements: Dirichlet processes are indifferent universal measurements reaching every way of selecting an interaction, whereas an indifferent universal measurement free of deterministic components necessarily selects the uniform density, so that the Born rule holds not only on average but with certainty. Deviations from the quantum statistics in sequences of measurements are governed by a single parameter, in principle accessible to experiment. The only geometric inputs are the Euclidean length of the membrane and the orthogonal landing of the point-particle on it; the latter is where the content of Gleason's theorem lies. Generalizations to N outcomes and to Bertrand's paradox are discussed.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Quantum Physics
Radial power-like potentials: from the Bohr-Sommerfeld $\ell \neq 0$ state energies to the exact ones
A Coherent Neutron-Nucleus Hybrid System Mediated by the Strong Interaction
Coherent Optical Control of a Single Donor Electron Spin
Experimental Observation of Error-Resilience Phase Transition on Superconducting Quantum Processor
Dynamical behaviour of the mass tensor in the lattice
Get the few papers worth your time in Quantum Physics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.