arXiv preprint ·
When Should We Intervene at Test Time?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Test-time adaptation helps a deployed model respond to changing inputs, but the same intervention can rescue one batch and damage the next. Updating normalization statistics, for example, can improve corrupted images yet fail when a batch contains mostly one class. Average accuracy hides these failures and cannot tell a model when to use an intervention. Target labels can guide this decision, but they are scarce and some choices are already clear. We introduce PORTAL, a controller that chooses when to deploy an intervention, which inputs to label, and when to stop querying. Each available prediction rule is a candidate, and its predictions are fixed before current feedback arrives. Every acquired label therefore evaluates all candidates on the same input. PORTAL combines these shared comparisons and directs queries toward candidates that can still overtake the current leader. It stops when the remaining labels cannot change the choice or when the possible accuracy gain no longer justifies another query. Our analysis links the required feedback to accuracy gaps and shared mistakes, explaining why some choices need much less evidence. Experiments show that this control turns an intervention that loses accuracy overall into a useful choice on selected batches. It prevents severe failures caused by changes in arrival order and preserves gains across complete corruption streams. When a fixed rule already works well, PORTAL uses little feedback to retain its performance. Periodic label checks reveal when past evidence needs refreshing and help the controller recover as conditions change. The acquired labels also train stronger candidates for future batches, and selection brings nearly all of their accuracy gains into deployment. The same feedback therefore improves both the choice made now and the predictions available to later batches.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Repulsive Population Policy Gradients for Behaviorally Diverse Reinforcement Learning
Jailbreak Connectivity: Towards Diverse, Transferable, and Universal Multimodal Large Language Model Jailbreak
Property-Based Testing for Robust Softmax and Cross-Entropy
Nemotron 3.5 Super and Lightning: Open, Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Models for Agentic AI
Simulated petrological labels enable probabilistic mineralogy prediction from whole-rock geochemistry
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.