arXiv preprint ·
When Is Additional Retrieval Worthwhile? A Cost-Aware Study of Evidence Gain and Answer Reliability in RAG
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can benefit from more sophisticated retrieval, but extra retrieval may be unnecessary for many questions and gains in evidence retrieval may not translate into faithful or correct answers. We study a cost-aware, two-action retrieval policy that chooses between a dense-retrieval-plus-reranking baseline and a hybrid lexical--dense retriever. Rather than classifying baseline retrieval as simply successful or unsuccessful, we estimate the question-specific incremental evidence-retrieval benefit of hybrid retrieval using features available before the routing decision. A regularized linear model and decision threshold are selected using document-grouped cross-validation and frozen prior to held-out evaluation. On 60 previously unseen QASPER training-split articles (188 questions, 169 evidence-evaluable), the policy triggers hybrid retrieval on 46 questions (24.5\%) and obtains the same evidence Hit@10 as always-hybrid retrieval (78.70\%, versus 76.92\% for always-keep). Paired, paper-cluster bootstrap intervals do not establish a reliable utility advantage. We further compare generated answers from a 4-bit Qwen3-4B model under the three retrieval policies. Provisional answer-level assessments show no clear correctness or faithfulness improvement after partial review, despite the evidence-retrieval result. The generation assessments remain model-assisted and lack independent human validation. These results expose an important distinction between retrieving relevant evidence efficiently and improving the reliability of the generated answer. The work is presented as a reproducible empirical study, not a claim of statistically established answer-quality superiority.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
ACOR: incremental evidence accumulation towards real-time DNA storage reconstruction
Predicting What Answer Engines Cite: Open Decision Models, Rerankers and a Distilled 4B Student on Ten Engines under Controlled Retrieval
Monitor Accuracy Isn't the Answer: A Decision-Value Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Restart Monitors
Manifest-Assisted Retrieval in Artificial Intelligence Search: Evidence Gaps and a Security Evaluation
QESChunker: A Single Objective Unifies Overlapping and Non-Overlapping Chunking for RAG
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.