arXiv preprint ·
AutoRSE: Evaluating LLM Agents as Recommendation Engineers for Self-Evolving Recommender Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Recommender Systems Engineer Agents (RSE-Agents), which use LLM-based agents to autonomously improve recommendation algorithms, are emerging as a promising paradigm. However, their capabilities and limitations remain poorly understood due to the lack of a unified, standardized evaluation framework and systematic trajectory-level analysis. To address this gap, we introduce AutoRSE, an evaluation framework spanning six representative industrial-grade recommendation tasks, and conduct a large-scale empirical study of three frontier LLMs across three widely used agent harnesses. Our results show that RSE-Agents consistently enhance the performance of backbones on five of the six tasks, with an average relative improvement of 16.1%, indicating that they can already autonomously improve recommendation performance. However, trajectory-level analysis also reveals that current RSE-Agents function primarily as engineering optimizers rather than algorithmic improvers: their gains are largely driven by hyperparameter tuning, training strategies, and model ensembling, while genuine algorithmic innovations are rare. Since the largest gains in recommender systems often stem from algorithmic advances, this behavior underscores a fundamental limitation of current RSE-Agents. To probe this limitation, we perform idea-injection experiments and show that agents equipped with innovative ideas from frontier research or human experts achieve substantially larger improvements than those relying on self-generated ideas. These results suggest that idea generation is a central bottleneck of current RSE-Agents, highlights a key direction for the future recommendation system research. Our implementation is publicly available on GitHub: https://github.com/Ray-Tiann/AutoRSE.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
ACOR: incremental evidence accumulation towards real-time DNA storage reconstruction
Predicting What Answer Engines Cite: Open Decision Models, Rerankers and a Distilled 4B Student on Ten Engines under Controlled Retrieval
Monitor Accuracy Isn't the Answer: A Decision-Value Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Restart Monitors
Manifest-Assisted Retrieval in Artificial Intelligence Search: Evidence Gaps and a Security Evaluation
QESChunker: A Single Objective Unifies Overlapping and Non-Overlapping Chunking for RAG
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.