arXiv preprint ·
Coverage Under Contradiction: A Benchmark for Negation-Aware Retrieval
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Coverage-evaluation benchmarks quantify whether retrieved evidence covers the different pieces of information needed to satisfy an information need. Existing benchmarks mostly consider factual claims that may already be known to pretrained retrieval components, leaving open whether retrievers find corpus evidence when it contradicts those priors. We study how retrievers behave when their parametric knowledge and the information in a corpus disagree. To do so, we develop a process to augment a nugget-based coverage benchmark with controlled contradictions. For each nugget, we create a negated counterpart and edit its supporting documents to support that negation while preserving the context. Applying this process to CoverageBench, a benchmark measuring information coverage, we create CoverageBench-Negate, spanning six datasets and roughly 63,000 original-edited evidence pairs (one per nugget-document link). We attach rich construction metadata to every pair and additionally provide out-of-family LLM judgments over all pairs and a human audit of a sample. In baseline experiments, BM25 separates original from edited near-twin evidence substantially better than dense retrievers (Qwen3 and Jina), which stay near chance. We release the benchmark on Hugging Face Datasets (nuggets, documents, pairs) together with the construction materials, including the prompts used to create it.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
ACOR: incremental evidence accumulation towards real-time DNA storage reconstruction
Predicting What Answer Engines Cite: Open Decision Models, Rerankers and a Distilled 4B Student on Ten Engines under Controlled Retrieval
Monitor Accuracy Isn't the Answer: A Decision-Value Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Restart Monitors
Manifest-Assisted Retrieval in Artificial Intelligence Search: Evidence Gaps and a Security Evaluation
QESChunker: A Single Objective Unifies Overlapping and Non-Overlapping Chunking for RAG
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.