arXiv preprint ·

Integrated Design and Reproducible Feasibility Analysis of a Four-Wheel Rover with Packet-Commanded Imaging, LiDAR Ranging, and Learning-Assisted Target Recognition

Sabik Bin Sultan, Shafi Bin Sultan, Safwan Sadad, Aranya Abeer Khan Prapya and Maria Sultan

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Robotics

Abstract

This study develops an integrated, reproducible design assessment for a four-wheel educational rover intended for the high-school remote-control division of the 2027 NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge. The architecture combines commercial differential drive control, independently sprung wheel carriers, separate drive and task batteries, and a Raspberry Pi-based subsystem that executes received imaging and ranging commands. The analysis reconciles component lists with dimensioned computer-aided design views, derives mobility and electrical constraints, and connects sensor geometry to command execution. At the estimated mass of 10.919 kg, a 215 mm wheel rotating at 200 RPM produces a theoretical rolling speed of 8.105 km/h; consequently, the nominal motor label does not establish compliance with an 8 km/h design ceiling. A steady 20-degree climb requires at least 1.255 newton-meters per wheel under an assumed rolling-resistance coefficient of 0.10 and equal torque sharing. At 50 ft, an ideal 12-inch feature spans approximately 71 pixels across a full-resolution Camera Module 3 Standard image, while a 1-degree pointing error displaces the ranging ray by approximately 266 mm. An executed synthetic benchmark compares color-geometry rules and two linear support-vector classifiers on 2,400 generated board crops with scene-disjoint evaluation. A separate reference command executor is checked using mocked hardware. These software results and analytical sensitivities support a testable development plan; the study does not report physical rover trials. The principal contribution is a traceable connection between component choices, failure mechanisms, quantitative design limits, and reproducible verification tasks.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Robotics

Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics