arXiv preprint ·
Generative Refinement Learning for Temporal Interpolation in Scientific Machine Learning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
A Better Guess Between Snapshots
The paper introduces iFLEX, which starts with a time-weighted average of the neighboring observations and uses a conditional diffusion model to generate the correction needed to match the missing field. Across turbulence, radar precipitation, and sea-surface-temperature data, iFLEX reconstructs fields with lower error than the evaluated baselines, including video-interpolation methods.
What they found: iFLEX was evaluated on Navier–Stokes Kraichnan turbulence, Shanghai radar precipitation, and sea surface temperature, and achieved lower reconstruction error than the evaluated baselines across these datasets. Those baselines included optical-flow and diffusion models originally developed for video frame interpolation.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Computationally expensive simulations and real-world observations often provide data at a lower temporal resolution than downstream tasks require. Averaging observations at fixed grid points can introduce errors, and motion estimates alone do not determine how the physical field values change. In this work, we study whether learning to correct a simple numerical interpolation improves the reconstruction of intermediate scientific fields. Our model, interpolative FLow EXpert (iFLEX), first estimates the missing field by taking a weighted average of the two observations at each grid point, giving more weight to the observation closer to the requested time. During training, subtracting this estimate from an observed intermediate field gives the residual that a conditional diffusion model learns to generate. Both observations condition the model, together with the target time, the interval between observations, and available physical parameters. To reconstruct an unobserved intermediate field, the generated residual is added to the weighted average. We evaluate iFLEX on Navier-Stokes Kraichnan turbulence, Shanghai radar precipitation, and sea surface temperature. Across these datasets, iFLEX achieves lower reconstruction error than the evaluated baselines, including optical-flow and diffusion models developed for video frame interpolation in computer vision. In a controlled turbulence comparison at a Reynolds number of 36,000, learning the residual reduces relative Frobenius norm error from about 13.7 for direct field generation to 10.5, with the diffusion backbone and training setup held fixed. Code is available at https://github.com/paulpuren/iflex.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Radial power-like potentials: from the Bohr-Sommerfeld $\ell \neq 0$ state energies to the exact ones
Goldbach Representations in Quantum Optics and Metrology
A Primer on Instanton Physics - A Short Course
Threshold Criteria for Bosonic and Fermionic Trimers on a Square Lattice: A Birman--Schwinger Comparison
From Entanglement Bootstrap to DHR Theory
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.