arXiv preprint ·
Governed Sovereign RAG for Public Administration: Tripartite Epistemic Routing, Facet-Guided Clarification, and Deterministic Numeric Verification in Citizen Services
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Deploying conversational assistants at government service desks faces a tension between regulatory certainty (zero tolerance for invented fees), data sovereignty prohibiting commercial clouds, and high rates of underspecified or out-of-jurisdiction citizen queries. We present and evaluate a governed, sovereign Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture deployed on the official portal of the State of Tlaxcala, Mexico (tlaxcaladigital.gob.mx), covering 1,143 procedures and a decoupled directory of 924 offices. The system governs interactions via three pillars: (1) a two-stage tripartite epistemic gate (clarify_policy and a Boltzmann distribution over AnyJev) arbitrating among answering (SPECIFIC), facet-guided clarification (CLARIFY), and abstaining (ABSTAIN); (2) a post-generation deterministic numeric verifier (verify_numeric_guardrail) with SHA-256 cache invalidation ensuring every generated fee or validity figure belongs to the retrieved official record; and (3) an empirical evaluation across 380 organic production traces (8 weeks) and a 200-query stratified benchmark (5-fold CV: 86.41% +/- 7.50%). In production, 89.47% of traffic is resolved at Level 0 via deterministic templates without free generation (global p50 = 0.665 s; direct L0 p50 = 0.445 s; slow-tail p95 = 30.412 s under CPU queuing), with 0/40 fiscal amount hallucinations observed in Level 1 (95% bound <= 8.81%). On the benchmark, the system achieves 86.50% strict Top-1 accuracy (+10.00 pp over a binary neural gate, p = 0.00453, p_Holm = 0.01172), pairing a 93.00% conditional safe upper bound with a 70.87% dropout-adjusted effective resolution after accounting for 53.33% citizen drop-off in clarification menus.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
No Tokenizer, Still a Gap: Cross-Lingual Fairness of Homoglyph and Invisible-Character Watermarking
From the Gettier Machine to Justified True Output: A Three-Step Account of Rational Trust in Generative AI
Multi-Scale Spatio-Temporal Exploratory Analysis of Urban Vehicle Theft
Beauty Is Human: When People Love AI-Generated Art, They Think a Human Made It
CogArena: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents on Interactive Behavioral Experiments
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.