arXiv preprint ·
MAREval: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating Natural Language Recommendation Explanations
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Evaluating natural language explanations in recommender systems is essential for fostering user trust, transparency, and engagement. However, existing evaluation approaches like human evaluations, while accurate, are resource-intensive and impractical at the scale required by modern recommendation platforms. Also, automated methods using single-agent LLMs suffer from prompt sensitivity and inconsistent outputs. To address these challenges, we propose MAREval, a structured multi-agent framework for evaluating recommendation explanations using large language models. MAREval orchestrates (i) a planner agent that uses a novel Chain of Debate (CoD) prompting strategy to coordinate agent roles and enforce logically consistent evaluation plans; (ii) a moderator agent that regulates discussions by mitigating prompt drift; and (iii) an arbitrator agent that aggregates outputs from multiple evaluation rounds and (iv) a Monte Carlo sampling method, improving robustness and alignment with human judgment. We conduct comprehensive evaluations on both public (TopicalChat) and proprietary recommendation datasets, demonstrating that MAREval outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Comprehensive experiments on a public benchmark and a proprietary e-commerce dataset show that MAREval improves alignment with human judgments over strong singleand multi-agent baselines. Stability analyses indicate substantially lower variability across repeated trials. In a large human-annotation gate, MAREval meets production quality thresholds where prior evaluators fall short, and online A/B testing demonstrates statistically significant improvements in engagement and revenue metrics. These results establish MAREval as a scalable and reliable solution for human-aligned evaluation of recommendation explanations in real-world systems
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Agent Memory as Recommendation: Recommender-System Design for Long-Term Memory of LLM Agents
ACOR: incremental evidence accumulation towards real-time DNA storage reconstruction
Knowing When the Evidence Is Enough: Requirement-Directed Search with Horn-Closure Certificates
Monitor Accuracy Isn't the Answer: A Decision-Value Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Restart Monitors
DPE-Rec: Diversity-Preserving and Efficient Diffusion Language Model Recommendation for Bundle Construction
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.