arXiv preprint ·
Ontology-guided multi-agent reasoning for explainable differential diagnosis
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Effective differential diagnosis depends on well structured and unambiguous patient case descriptions, since incomplete or ambiguous clinical information readily leads to diagnostic errors and inconsistent reasoning. Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown promising capabilities in medical question answering and clinical reasoning; however, even when achieving competitive performance on medical benchmarks, they often rely on pattern recognition learned from training data rather than grounded clinical evidence, and can generate plausible yet unsupported diagnostic conclusions. Their reasoning remains largely opaque, making it difficult for clinicians to assess the evidence and rationale behind a given recommendation. To address this gap, we propose an ontology-guided, multiagent differential diagnosis framework that replicates the iterative reasoning process of physicians. The framework grounds diagnostic inference in a structured, expert-curated medical knowledge base, enabling interpretation of symptoms, clinical findings, or disease relationships, while decomposing diagnosis into explicit, auditable reasoning steps. This ontology-based grounding constrains inference to evidence-backed associations, reducing hallucination and improving diagnostic transparency, traceability, and consistency. The system then identifies the most discriminative missing symptoms and generates targeted follow-up questions to reduce uncertainty through a process that mirrors to clinical inquiry. Together, these components improve the reliability, explainability, and diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted differential diagnosis. The source code is publicly available.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
SlowLab: Benchmarking Autonomous AI Agents on a Year of Experiments They Cannot Undo
GarmentSegAgent: Autonomous Garment Segmentation for Web Fashion Images via Textual Self-Refinement
Collective Emergent Alignment: Measuring and Amplifying Interaction-Induced Reasoning Alignment in Multi-Agent LLMs
Remembering Is Not Enough: Refining Memories and Learning When to Use Them in Multi-Agent Systems
ClinVerse: A Realistic Multi-Agent Diagnostic Environment for Training and Evaluating Medical Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.