arXiv preprint ·
Is the education gap in generative AI use smaller than the internet's was at a similar level of use? Evidence from 16 European countries
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
New technologies are usually adopted first by people with more formal education. This paper asks whether the education gap in generative AI use in 2025 is smaller or larger than the internet's gap in the same country in the year when overall internet use was at a similar level. It uses public Eurostat survey data on ICT usage by individuals aged 16 to 74. Each country's 2025 rate of generative AI use in the last three months is matched to the internet year whose overall last-three-months use was closest, within 5 percentage points, and the gap between people with high (ISCED 5 to 8) and low (ISCED 0 to 2) completed education is measured as a log ratio and as a percentage-point difference. Sixteen of 35 countries could be matched; most of the others were early internet adopters. In the matched countries, the generative AI gap was smaller in 13 of 16 countries on the log ratio (median change -0.625, 95% bootstrap interval -0.969 to -0.291, two-sided sign test p = 0.021) and in 15 of 16 on the percentage-point gap (median change -27.6 points, interval -32.2 to -16.8, p = 0.0005). The point-gap result keeps its sign in every generative-AI-versus-internet sensitivity analysis with 8 or more countries, including comparisons restricted on both sides to ages 25 to 54 and 55 to 74, but its size is sensitive to matching that takes education composition into account (about -10 to -11 points in 7 and 8 countries). The ratio result is fragile: it fails the decision rule when countries matched at their first internet observation are removed (9 of 11, p = 0.065). The analysis follows an unpublished plan whose timing cannot be verified, so it is not presented as pre-registered. The results describe unadjusted education contrasts in a non-random set of countries, not an education effect, and do not generalise to the EU as a whole.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
Safe by Benchmark, Unsafe in Practice: Lessons from 1331 Child-Related AI Incidents
No Tokenizer, Still a Gap: Cross-Lingual Fairness of Homoglyph and Invisible-Character Watermarking
Arya Forge: Auditing Validation and Release Approval for Financial Instruction Data
Multi-Scale Spatio-Temporal Exploratory Analysis of Urban Vehicle Theft
High Scores, Hidden Failures: Evaluating Codebook-Based LLM Content Analysis
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.