arXiv preprint ·
Practice Makes Perfect: Tacit Knowledge, Generative AI, and Returns to Schooling and Experience
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Generative AI changes the scarcity of different forms of human capital. It makes codified knowledge cheaply available at the point of production, while judgment acquired through practice remains tied more closely to the worker. We ask what this does to two familiar prices in the wage structure: the return to schooling and the return to experience. In a short-run framework, machine-supplied codified knowledge substitutes directly for the codified component of worker human capital, lowering the schooling gradient. If codified and practice-based knowledge are complements, the return to experience rises where learning through practice is fastest; technology-specific experience can also become obsolete, rotating the experience profile rather than shifting it uniformly. Using US Current Population Survey earnings data from 2018 through June 2026, we compare occupations in the top and bottom quartiles of the pre-ChatGPT Felten-Raj-Seamans exposure index. After the public release of ChatGPT, the return to a year of schooling falls by 0.55 log points in exposed occupations. The return to a year of experience rises by 0.26 log points at three years of potential experience, is unchanged at fifteen, and falls by 0.12 log points at twenty-five; under the baseline quadratic, the effect crosses zero at 18.1 years. These breaks appear with the release, disappear under a pandemic placebo, survive a common censoring rule across the full sample, and remain when each occupation is allowed its own pre-shock schooling and experience gradients. The pattern is a repricing of human capital inside exposed occupations: codifiable knowledge becomes less scarce, while the value of experience depends increasingly on whether it transfers to the new technology.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in General Economics
Crowds Believe in You: Online Prediction Markets Overestimate How Often People Achieve Their Own Goals
A Stationary Mean-Field Model for Carbon Market Stability Reserve
Designing Behavioral Profiles for Language Model Simulation of Out-of-Distribution Human Behavior
The Delegation Divide: An Open Index of AI-Agent Delegability across Occupations and Countries
How Green Is Your Manifesto? Scoring Environmental Positions in the 2024 EU Elections with an LLM Panel
Get the few papers worth your time in General Economics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.