arXiv preprint ·
Testing Agentic Service Systems: An Agentic Living Lab Methodology Across the Physical-Digital Continuum
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Task success is insufficient for testing agents that act for principals, change persistent business state, and affect physical processes: a useful result may be unauthorized, leave obligations unresolved, or depend on the execution substrate. We propose an Agentic Living Lab methodology organized around three questions: what is the test unit, who and what participate, and under what reality is the test executed? The unit is a service episode containing delegated roles, obligations, world state, and evidence. The method separates agents under test from environment actors and distinguishes real humans, human traces, rule surrogates, and agent-based proxies. Realization Profiles, capability-declared Reality Substrate bindings, Grounding Profiles, and Semantic Delta disclosures make changes across software, enterprise systems, simulation, and physical settings explicit. A four-plane reference architecture separates experiment control, participants, world realization, and evidence evaluation, with cross-cutting authority and governance controls. Runtime semantics distinguish intent, normative admission, and factual reconciliation. Real stakeholder grounding, participant calibration or validation, and governed feedback are required for the Living Lab claim, but not synchronous human participation in every run. Released JSON Schemas, deterministic fixtures, and a limited reference runner make selected rules machine-checkable; they are not a complete platform or empirical validation. Constructed travel and industrial designs illustrate authorization and fulfillment failures, proxy sensitivity, and substrate changes. Agent quality, proxy validity, and cross-substrate effect stability remain empirical questions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Thinking-in-Bets at Test Time Reduces Sycophantic Revisions in LLM Agents
ProCerDCL: Query-Efficient Black-Box Probabilistic Verification of Deep Learning Compiler Optimization
The Physical Cost of Context: Quality-Constrained Resource Accounting for Coding Agents
From Ripple to Boundary: Deterministic Impact Boundaries for LLM-Based Software Evolution
Arya Forge: Auditing Validation and Release Approval for Financial Instruction Data
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.