arXiv preprint ·
Atomic Security Concerns: Towards a Foundational Language for Security Knowledge Representation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Cybersecurity governance, risk management, compliance, and security architecture rely on numerous concepts, including security properties, domains, controls, risks, implementation measures, capabilities, and compliance requirements. Although these concepts are widely used, they are often represented through heterogeneous abstractions and vocabularies, making relationships among them difficult to express consistently and leaving much of the associated reasoning dependent on expert knowledge. This paper introduces the concepts of Security Concerns and Atomic Security Concerns (ASCs) and explores the hypothesis that cybersecurity knowledge may be represented through a finite set of foundational concerns. Inspired by the role of atoms in chemistry, the proposed approach views cybersecurity concepts as compositions of more fundamental concerns rather than as independent abstractions. Hence, Atomic Security Concerns could be viewed as a common abstraction layer for the representation of cybersecurity concepts, independently of their domain, nature, or level of granularity. Building upon this perspective, the paper explores how Atomic Security Concerns may provide the vocabulary of a cybersecurity language and how cybersecurity concepts may be represented as concern sets supporting explicit relationships among concepts. The contribution of this work is intentionally conceptual: it introduces a framework and research hypothesis for investigating the foundations of a common language for cybersecurity knowledge representation, reasoning, and future formalization.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
From Speech Tokens to Stolen Voices: Attacker-Chosen-Text Speaker Impersonation via Representation Inversion
What Victims Take Away: Attack Reuse and Defense Revision after Prompt-Injection Attacks
Scope-Gap Injection: Exploiting Evaluator Channel Blind Spots in the OpenClaw Agent Security Competition
No Tokenizer, Still a Gap: Cross-Lingual Fairness of Homoglyph and Invisible-Character Watermarking
Attack logics, not outputs: Concept-based Property Attacks for Shortcut Elimination in Neural Networks
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.