arXiv preprint ·
Then there is prompt injection, a malicious email, ...: The Wild Wide West of OpenClaw Agentic System Security
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
AI-powered personal assistant frameworks such as OpenClaw combine LLM reasoning, persistent memory, tool invocation, local execution, and web-based workflows. These capabilities enable useful automation, but they also create security risks when untrusted inputs, model reasoning, tools, memory, and deployment configuration interact without explicit trust boundaries. This paper presents an empirical study of reported security concerns in OpenClaw using two complementary data sources: Reddit discussions and security-tagged GitHub issues. We analyze more than 25K Reddit posts from 13 OpenClaw-related subreddits and identify 162 security-relevant posts with 1,787 associated comments. We further collect 358 security-tagged GitHub issues and retain 180 issues describing concrete security concerns. Using qualitative analysis and evidence-grounded CWE mapping, we identify 521 CWE instances across 59 distinct weakness types, concentrated in access-control failures, sensitive-data exposure, injection, and unsafe execution. We also extract 543 practitioner mitigation suggestions and consolidate them into seven recurring strategies. To complement the empirical analysis, we present an evidence-grounded illustrative reconstruction of a representative sensitive-data exposure pathway using dummy secret values. Our findings show that OpenClaw security issues are not isolated implementation bugs; they reflect recurring trust-boundary failures across the agent execution pipeline. We discuss how these weaknesses map to both traditional software-security categories and agent-specific failure mechanisms, and derive implications for safer agentic systems, including explicit trust boundaries, least-privilege tool access, execution containment, runtime oversight, and defense-in-depth deployment.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Cryptography & Security
From Speech Tokens to Stolen Voices: Attacker-Chosen-Text Speaker Impersonation via Representation Inversion
What Victims Take Away: Attack Reuse and Defense Revision after Prompt-Injection Attacks
Scope-Gap Injection: Exploiting Evaluator Channel Blind Spots in the OpenClaw Agent Security Competition
No Tokenizer, Still a Gap: Cross-Lingual Fairness of Homoglyph and Invisible-Character Watermarking
Attack logics, not outputs: Concept-based Property Attacks for Shortcut Elimination in Neural Networks
Get the few papers worth your time in Cryptography & Security every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.