arXiv preprint ·
Identities, Not Pairs: Distribution-Free False-Accept Control for Embedding-Based Verification
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Embedding-based verification often calibrates a false-accept threshold from all impostor pairs among $m$ identities, although these pairs share identities. We characterize a worst-case limit: when hub identities score highly against a fraction $ρ$ of the population, a calibration-only threshold with marginal false-accept rate (FAR) at most $α$ under every identity-exchangeable law reaches the hub score on hub-free calibration sets with probability at most $(m+2)α/(2ρ)$. Uniformly accepting near that score at levels well below $ρ/m$ therefore requires trial information. We propose COVE, which ranks the trial pair among all $N=\binom{m+2}{2}$ pairs formed by augmenting the calibration units with the probe and reference. Under identity exchangeability, its marginal FAR is at most $\lfloorαN\rfloor/N$, with first possible acceptance at $1/N=O(1/m^2)$. The rule also retains this guarantee with a fixed symmetric cohort-normalized score using an independent cohort. On 6 benchmarks and 8 frozen encoders, realised FAR was consistent with the exact bound. Where both valid calibration-only baselines accepted nothing, COVE retained a median $100\%$ of the sampled oracle's true-accept rate over reliable comparisons. In contrast, an empirical quantile over dependent pairs reached 2.87$\,α$ FAR, and a binomial upper confidence bound over pairs missed its nominal 95\% conditional-FAR target in up to 55\% of calibration draws. Symmetric CSLS raised COVE's true-accept rate by up to 4.3-fold in the tested settings. The code is available in https://github.com/salimkhazem/Cove.git
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning (Statistics)
Intrinsic Information Rates of Summaries in Simulation-Based Inference
Second-order Sinkhorn Geometry and $\sqrt{n}$-Inference
Designing Customer Feedback for Subscription Boxes
Algorithmics for Graphical Separation Criteria
When Does Data Value Reduce to Class Balance? A Coverage View of Per-Point Data Valuation
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning (Statistics) every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.