arXiv preprint ·
Risk-Aware Output Control Should be the Focus of Machine Unlearning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Well-documented failure modes of machine learning (ML) systems, including bias, toxicity, hallucination, and leakage of sensitive information, has driven the rise of machine unlearning (MU). Most existing work, however, targets parameter-space indistinguishability, seeking unlearned models that are as close as possible to models retrained from scratch on retained data. In this paper, we argue that this objective is misaligned with practical and user-relevant concerns: MU should prioritize statistically guaranteed output-space control rather than parameter-space similarity. We contend that output control with statistical guarantees is the operationally meaningful notion of unlearning, as it supports rigorous and robust objectives, scales to modern deployment settings, and enables interpretable guarantees. We substantiate this position with empirical evidence and with recent theoretical results that, although not originally formulated in this framing, are consistent with it.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Intrinsic Information Rates of Summaries in Simulation-Based Inference
Second-order Sinkhorn Geometry and $\sqrt{n}$-Inference
Designing Customer Feedback for Subscription Boxes
Algorithmics for Graphical Separation Criteria
When Does Data Value Reduce to Class Balance? A Coverage View of Per-Point Data Valuation
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.