arXiv preprint ·
GADAR: Generalizing Across Domains via Action Ranking for Classical Planning
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Learned policies for classical planning act without search, but each is tied to the domain it was trained on: network modules per action schema, parameters per predicate, or vocabulary-sized encodings mean a trained policy cannot even be executed on a new domain's predicates and action schemas. We present GADAR (Generalizing Across Domains via Action Ranking), a policy that takes the domain description as input, π(s, G, D), and constructs grounded actions in domains never seen in training, without search. Symbols are described by the roles they play in the domain rather than by their names, in three layers that each extend the previous one: (i) a lifted domain layer embeds D in every state graph through structural signatures; (ii) a binding layer ties each ground action's applicability to the lifted preconditions it instantiates; and (iii) a chain layer states which schema produces what another needs and how far each schema stands from the goal. The same network therefore runs on every domain, seen or unseen. We evaluate zero-shot generalization leave-one-domain-out over eight benchmark domains. A single GADAR policy trained on seven domains solves 58.3% of their test instances, one point below the 59.3% of dedicated single-domain GADAR models, so one policy serves many domains at no cost in coverage; a multi-task control that keeps symbol identity in its weights, while strong on some of the domains it trains on, transfers to none of the held-out ones. Zero-shot, GADAR executes on every held-out domain and exceeds random choice under the same executor on the large test instances of all eight: it solves 22.6% of them on average, against 3.3% for random choice and 0.6% for the same representation without the chain layer, and reaches 68% on held-out Visitall. Zero-shot coverage nonetheless remains well below in-domain coverage on most domains, and we analyze where it is weakest.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
SlowLab: Benchmarking Autonomous AI Agents on a Year of Experiments They Cannot Undo
Repulsive Population Policy Gradients for Behaviorally Diverse Reinforcement Learning
RobotAgentBench: Towards Open-world Robot Autonomy
LM-DSB: A Lightweight Multi-agent System for Automated Daily Safety Bulletin Generation in Construction
Thinking-in-Bets at Test Time Reduces Sycophantic Revisions in LLM Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.