arXiv preprint ·
Can System-1-Style Decision Models Replace Dedicated Rerankers in RAG? A Systems Evaluation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems often use a dedicated reranker to choose which retrieved candidates reach the language model. Reranking improves relevance but adds latency, so teams look for faster alternatives. System-1style decision models make direct, structured predictions instead of generating long responses. Could one provide comparable reranking quality with less inference overhead? We first screen 21 open-weight models on 11 benchmarks, then compare a promising decision model with a dedicated reranker on identical candidate lists. The default decision-model setup fails on many long candidate sets, so scoring only the requests it completes gives a misleading ranking. Limiting candidate text length largely restores reliability and makes some configurations competitive. A frozen evaluation on new retrieval data supports the reliability and ranking results, but confirms the latency requirement for only one of the two selected configurations. Across workloads, which model ranks better changes, and a tuned reranker remains faster and uses far less GPU memory. A decision model can perform competitive reranking, but replacing a reranker requires weighing quality, latency and memory together, and teams should tune the reranker they already run first.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Dream to Assist: Intent-Conditioned World Models for Shared Vehicle Control
Repulsive Population Policy Gradients for Behaviorally Diverse Reinforcement Learning
AdaTutor: Adaptive Tutoring through Pedagogical Strategy Selection
Property-Based Testing for Robust Softmax and Cross-Entropy
Video World Models Need Predictable Latents
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.