arXiv preprint ·
SKALOS: Learning to Distinguish Similar Skills with Capability Graphs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Skills provide LLM agents with reusable procedural knowledge, making appropriate skill selection essential for reliable agent behavior. As skill libraries expand, distinguishing semantically similar candidates becomes increasingly difficult. Existing methods encode or rewrite skill descriptions for relevance-based ranking, yet heterogeneous descriptions can obscure capability differences. To address this challenge, we propose SKALOS, a graph-native reranker that compares skills via explicit capability evidence. Its multi-hierarchy graph aligns equivalent expressions across skills while preserving skill-specific capability evidence. Since individually relevant capability elements may not jointly support a query, semiring-based capability witness learning scores each branch by its weakest evidence, checks joint support for the extracted requirements within one implementation, and selects the strongest alternative. To reduce the influence of extraction errors, we develop ranking-feedback graph calibration that adjusts unreliable evidence for candidate comparison. Experiments on SkillRet show that SKALOS improves NDCG@10 by 2.68 percentage points over a matched text-only reranker. Witness-guided skill selection also increases ALFWorld task success rate from 22% to 29%.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
SlowLab: Benchmarking Autonomous AI Agents on a Year of Experiments They Cannot Undo
Repulsive Population Policy Gradients for Behaviorally Diverse Reinforcement Learning
RobotAgentBench: Towards Open-world Robot Autonomy
LM-DSB: A Lightweight Multi-agent System for Automated Daily Safety Bulletin Generation in Construction
Thinking-in-Bets at Test Time Reduces Sycophantic Revisions in LLM Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.