arXiv preprint ·
Benchmarking Obstacle-Conditioned Safety in Household Robot Navigation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Safe household navigation requires robots to regulate clearance and speed according to what an obstacle is and how close it is, without unnecessary conservatism. Yet existing evaluations do not test whether semantic safety distinctions are reflected in continuous motion. To that end, we introduce OSMA-Bench, an Obstacle-Conditioned Safe Motion Adaptation Benchmark built on spatially matched scenario sets that differ only in obstacle type. We also propose the \emph{Semantic Sensitivity Index} (SSI), which measures whether clearance and distance-dependent speed and smoothness follow the caution ordering of obstacles. Evaluating VLM-based and vision-language-action (VLA) policies on the benchmark, we find that neither consistently adapts its motion to obstacle safety, even with explicit safety prompts. Our analysis shows that the policies can correctly distinguish obstacles by safety relevance but fail to reflect this distinction in the motion parameters or actions they produce. For VLM-based policies, which recognize the obstacle and then generate a navigation program, adding an explicit parameter-inference step between these two stages improves adaptation. These findings expose a gap in \emph{semantic-to-motion grounding}, highlighting the need to translate semantic caution into appropriately safe motion.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Robotics
RobotAgentBench: Towards Open-world Robot Autonomy
A Singularity Avoiding Track Model for Race Car Optimization
Dream to Assist: Intent-Conditioned World Models for Shared Vehicle Control
Ground Sample Distance Constrained k-Coverage Viewpoint Planning via Set Multi-Cover Formulation
Video World Models Need Predictable Latents
Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.