arXiv preprint ·
Outcome-Aware Agents: When Does Causal Structure Help a Forward Model Foresee the Consequences of Actions?
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Agents that act on real systems should predict what their actions will cause before acting. We study when causal structure helps a learned forward model do this, using a planner that rejects candidate actions whose simulated multi-step outcome is unsafe, in synthetic structural causal models where the true consequences are known. We compare the Action-Conditioned Latent Structural Causal Model (AC-LSCM: per-factor mechanisms over a learned sparse graph, actions as do-interventions) with three unstructured forward models on seven random graphs with 10 or 20 variables, a task configured by a fixed rule, and two controls: a do-wrapper that gives every model the same action semantics, and counterfactual data given to all models or to none. When its factors are the observed variables, AC-LSCM recovers the true graph exactly on every 10-variable graph and has lower three-step prediction error than every baseline in all 396 paired comparisons. Its excess safety violations over an oracle are 0.25 of the no-model level on 10-variable graphs (best baseline 0.31) and 0.41 on 20-variable graphs (0.53), and its margin is largest for two-variable actions never seen in training (0.18 versus 0.28). With learned latent factors the same model is worse than the baselines; the choice of factors matters more than the explicit do-operator or counterfactual data, and every planner stays far from the oracle. This version corrects an earlier one, whose model learned an empty graph and whose headline 36x safety improvement came from a task that tested only extrapolation of action values; we withdraw that claim. Code and all per-seed results are released.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Continual Learning Exam: Benchmarking Long-Horizon RSI and Experiential Learning in LLM Agents
SlowLab: Benchmarking Autonomous AI Agents on a Year of Experiments They Cannot Undo
Beyond Belief: Evaluating and Mitigating LLM Susceptibility to Misinformation
RobotAgentBench: Towards Open-world Robot Autonomy
QECGBERT: A Scalable ECG Foundation Model Based on Self-Supervised Language Learning via VQ-VAE Waveform Tokenization
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.