arXiv preprint ·
R2A-Sales: A Policy-Atom-Matched Benchmark for Rule-to-Action Gaps in Goal-Directed Sales Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LLM-based sales agents are often evaluated on static policy questions or task success, but deployment asks a sharper question: when a model can state a rule, will it choose compliant, tool-grounded actions under commercial pressure? We introduce R2A-Sales (Rule-to-Action), a policy-atom-matched benchmark for this question. Each item pairs a static probe with a multi-turn sales scenario sharing the same versioned policy atom, facts, evidence, behavioral constraints, and tool contract, so differences cannot be attributed to policy-content mismatch. In the interactive arm, a code-owned ledger verifies committed tool effects and terminal states; unsupported action claims receive no credit. We report static compliance $K$, grounded action compliance $A=\Pr(\text{safe terminal}\land\text{no hard violation}\land\text{non-echo})$, and the matched gap $G=K-A$. The frozen release spans three controlled Chinese-language sales domains, 24 policy atoms, 42 semantic cores, and 2,016 matched pairs. The confirmatory study audits 21,888 runs over 19 cores, covering eight backbones plus four Qwen3-8B prompt treatments (12 configurations). Static compliance is near ceiling $(K=89.9\%\text{--}99.1\%)$, yet eight-backbone action compliance is only $A=3.0\%\text{--}17.3\%$, giving $G=80.4\text{--}92.5$ percentage points. Since $A$ also requires safe termination, $G$ upper-bounds rule-to-action degradation rather than isolating pressure alone. No prompt-only treatment dominates all metrics. R2A-Sales shows that sales-agent reliability must be measured at committed action, not rule recital or task completion alone.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Continual Learning Exam: Benchmarking Long-Horizon RSI and Experiential Learning in LLM Agents
SlowLab: Benchmarking Autonomous AI Agents on a Year of Experiments They Cannot Undo
Beyond Belief: Evaluating and Mitigating LLM Susceptibility to Misinformation
RobotAgentBench: Towards Open-world Robot Autonomy
QECGBERT: A Scalable ECG Foundation Model Based on Self-Supervised Language Learning via VQ-VAE Waveform Tokenization
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.