arXiv preprint ·
The LALA Benchmark: Evaluating Literary and Linguistic Analysis in LLMs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We introduce the Literature and Linguistics Analysis Benchmark (LALA), comprising 236 open-ended questions written by experts in linguistics and literary studies, together with expert-provided ideal answers. By comparing models within families and at similar training scales using human and LLM judges, LALA identifies differences in linguistic competence associated with post-training, offering a framework for evaluating future models and guiding targeted improvements. We administered questions to 17 language models and evaluated their responses using both human expert assessment and two LLM evaluators, Sol and Qwen. Base models displayed little of the linguistic competence assessed by the benchmark, whereas their post-trained versions performed markedly better, suggesting that post-training plays a central role in making linguistic knowledge accessible and usable. Parameter count, by contrast, showed no statistically significant association with partial-credit performance, and competencies remained unevenly distributed across linguistic domains. We interpret this pattern as evidence that post-training adds linguistic competencies piecemeal, without producing a general linguistic intelligence capable of extending them beyond the learned policies that support them. Models performed best on logical relations between statements and selected discourse-level tasks, while even the strongest post-trained models continued to struggle with ambiguity, literary style, reference, and misleading assumptions. Human and Sol evaluations produced nearly identical model rankings in both the original and ReliableEval runs, supporting the replicability of the comparative results.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Continual Learning Exam: Benchmarking Long-Horizon RSI and Experiential Learning in LLM Agents
Heard Enough to Act: Early Tool Calling in Spoken Dialogue Systems
How Do Small Coding Agents Use Code Graphs and Embeddings?
AdaTutor: Adaptive Tutoring through Pedagogical Strategy Selection
Beyond Belief: Evaluating and Mitigating LLM Susceptibility to Misinformation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.