arXiv preprint ·
What Sketches Tell Us about LVLMs: Conventions, Grounding, and Localisation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
LVLM benchmarks tell us whether a model answers correctly, but not which visual conventions it has retained, nor where those conventions live. Sketches expose this hidden structure. A sketch removes texture, lighting, and photographic context while preserving the strokes humans judged sufficient for recognition. If an LVLM can operate on that abstraction, the surviving signal is structural rather than merely photometric. We introduce a training-free sketch probe with three readouts: temporal part-construction order, spatial attention-based grounding, and the mechanistic layer/head locus of grounding. We evaluate nine LVLMs on part order and five on the attention readouts, over two part-annotated sketch datasets. Three findings emerge. First, LVLM part order tracks human convention: models reproduce canonical orderings where human drawings converge, and become correspondingly variable where human orderings vary. Controls that blank, withhold, and mismatch the sketch locate this convention in the language model. Second, part-level grounding survives the abstraction: attention heads selected from the frozen model with an existing recipe recover part and object regions on object and scene sketches, with no grounding supervision. Third, the grounding signal concentrates in a narrow mid-network band whose location follows the base language model rather than parameter count in the two families we compare, and remains stable across object and scene sketches. The result is a practical diagnostic for sketch-driven LVLMs: no fine-tuning, no auxiliary segmenter, and a layer band that doubles as a head-selection prior, matching or improving grounding mAcc@0.1 in every model and dataset we tested.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computer Vision
Continual Learning Exam: Benchmarking Long-Horizon RSI and Experiential Learning in LLM Agents
Regional prediction of hematoma expansion from non-contrast computed tomography in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients
Accuracy Is Not Enough: An Efficiency- and Statistics-Aware Benchmark of ResNet50 and Vision Transformer for Explainable Multi-Class Gastrointestinal Diseases Classification
StreamVibe: Proactive Video Agents for Evolving User Intent
InteractiveWorld: A Verifiable Human-Centric Environment for Building Better Interactive MLLM Assistants
Get the few papers worth your time in Computer Vision every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.